GENDER-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF PROGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION USING THE ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION SCALES
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2016-31-1-21-27
Abstract
The aim of the study was to elucidate genderrelated differences in the effects of anxietydepression disorders on the prognosis of myocardial infarction (MI) and to develop a complex of clinicalinstrumental and psychophysiologic indicators predicting 1year prognosis in MI depending on patient gender. Materials and Methods: the study included a total of 346 patients with Qwave MI who were admitted to hospital during the first 24 hours after MI beginning and discharged for outpatient treatment. At day 5–7 of MI, the following studies were performed: clinical status evaluation, 24h ECG monitoring with assessment of heart rate variability (HRV), echocardiography, and psychological testing for depression by Zung scale and for personal and reactive anxiety by Spielberg–Hanin scale. One year after MI beginning, cases of fatal outcomes, repeated MI, unstable angina, and repeated hospitalizations were studied. Results: In men with MI, unlike that in women, evaluation of the complex of unfavorable psychophysiological and clinical parameters resulted in increase in the prognosis efficacy. Association of high levels of personal anxiety and depression during an inhospital period predicted unfavorable 1year prognosis with 90% probability whereas the absence of these disorders predicted favorable course of disease. The use of psychological assessment scales together with assessment of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) or HRV (SDNN) increased prediction efficacy to 100%. Conclusion: Significance of the prognostic factor complex in MI differs depending on patient gender. The presence of high levels of anxiety and depression during inhospital period in men suggested unfavorable 1year prognosis especially in the presence of a decrease in LV EF and HRV. However, development of other, more effective prediction models is required for women with MI.
About the Authors
N. B. LebedevaRussian Federation
N. Y. Ardashova
Russian Federation
O. L. Barbarash
Russian Federation
References
1. Лебедева Н.Б., Ардашова Н.Ю., Барбараш О.Л. Влияние гендерного фактора на клиническую и прогностическую значимость повышенной тревожности при инфаркте миокарда // Проблемы женского здоровья. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 48–54.
2. Оганов Р.Г., Погосова Г.В., Колтунов И.Е. и др. Депрессивная симптоматика ухудшает прогноз сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний и снижает продолжительность жизни больных артериальной гипертонией и ишемической болезнью сердца // Кардиология. – 2011. – № 2. – С. 59–66.
3. Bjerkeset O., Nordahl H.M., Mykletun A. Anxiety and depression following myocardial infarction: gender differences in a 5¬year prospective study // J. Psychosom. Res. – 2005. – Vol. 58(2). – P. 153–161.
4. Benninghoven D., Kaduk A., Wigand U. et al. Influence of anxiety on the course of heart disease after acute myocardial infarction – risk factor or protective function? // Psychother. Psychosom. – 2006. – Vol. 75(1). – P. 56–61.
5. Carney R.M., Freedland K.E. Depression in patients with coronary heart disease // Am. J. Med. – 2008. – Vol. 121. – P. 20–27.
6. Carney R.M., Freedland K.E., Veith R.C. Depression, the autonomic nervous system and coronary heart disease // Psychosom. Med. – 2005. – Vol. 67(1). – P. 29–33.
7. Frasure¬Smith N., Lesperance F. Reflections on depression as a cardiac risk factors // Psychosom. Med. – 2005. – Vol. 67. – P. 19–25.
8. Guinjoan S.M., De Guevara M.S., Correa C. et al. Cardiac parasympathetic dysfunction related to depression in older adults with acute coronary syndromes // J. Psychosom. Res. – 2004. – Vol. 56. – P. 83–88.
9. Hendrix K.H., Mayhan S., Egan B.M. Gender and age¬related differences in treatment and control of cardiovascular risk factors among high¬risk patients with angina // J. Clin. Hypertension. – 2005. – Vol. 7(7). – P. 386–388.
10. Moser D.K., McKinley S., Riegel B. et al. Relationship of persistent symptoms of anxiety to morbidity and mortality outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease // Psychosom. Med. – 2011. – Vol. 73. – P. 803–809.
11. Mendelsohn M.E., Karas R.H. Molecular and cellular basis of cardiovascular gender differences // Science. – 2005. – Vol. 308. – P. 1583–1587.
12. Naqvi T.Z., Naqvi S., Bairey¬Merz N.B. Gender differences in the link between depression and cardiovascular disease. // Psychosom. Med. – 2005. – Vol. 67. – P. 15–18.
13. Roest A.M., Martens E.J., de Jone P. et al. Anxiety and risk of incident coronary heart disease. A meta¬analysis // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. – 2010. – Vol. 56. – P. 38–46.
14. Shimbo K.W., Davidson D.C., Haas V. et al. Negative impact of depression on outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: mechanisms, treatment considerations, and future directions // J. Thromb. and Haem. – 2005. – Vol. 3. – P. 897–908.
15. Van Melle J.P., Jonge P.T., Spijkerman A. Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: a meta¬analysis // Psychosom. Med. – 2004. – Vol. 66. – P. 814–822.
Review
For citations:
Lebedeva N.B., Ardashova N.Y., Barbarash O.L. GENDER-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF PROGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION USING THE ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION SCALES. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2016;31(1):21-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2016-31-1-21-27